The annotates samples from unit 2 will be placed here. The comments below should contain the overall summary of each sample reviewed. The comments should have the evaluators' name, sample name, who the sample was by, and a paragraph summarizing the overall evaluation of each sample. This can be put on one post as long as the names of the samples are separated. Evaluations for the samples from this unit is by Yi, Aamna, and Regina. Evaluations by regina: Christopher's Samples:
Cynthia's Samples:
Evaluations by aamna:
Cynthia's Samples:
Evaluations by yi: Christopher's Samples:
Cynthia's Samples:
7 Comments
Regina Ho
1/12/2015 08:15:03 am
Cynthia Ch 7.1 Outline: Overall the chapter outline followed what was required of the class but I felt like it could use a few improvements. For example, adding a little more detail and listing some examples can help make the outline a better tool for studying. It helped me because I felt like after comparing mine to her's mine was a little more helpful when I need to study for an upcoming test.
Regina Ho
1/13/2015 09:26:59 am
Chris LNG ch 7: I felt that overall the lng was very vague regarding the context of the topic. Most of the time there were very short one sentence answers to the questions on the sides. Also there were very little examples of formulas and etc. I felt that if examples were added along with more explicit details, the lng would be a great help when studying for an upcoming test.
Aamna Haq
1/13/2015 01:33:29 pm
Christopher's Ch. 7 LNG: You answered some of the main questions and topics that the chapter explained, but you did not further delve into detail. Also, there were no self annotations on your LNG. You should try and expand on the topics mentioned in the chapter and also reflect on your notes with your own annotations.
Aamna Haq
1/13/2015 01:56:54 pm
Cynthia's Ch 7.1 Outline: Good Job! You did exactly what is expected for a chapter outline. However, i think you could have added a more informative description to you figure summaries, but in retrospect, your sample was great.
yi liu
1/20/2015 02:21:42 pm
Christopher LNG Ch 7: I felt that this LNG ch 7 was somewhat lacking from a normal LNG. It was very ambiguous in which the explanation/answer to what your questions were. It could have been a lot better in the sense of adding more details into the explanation part. What you could have done was add much more details into this LNG.
yi liu
1/20/2015 02:54:59 pm
Cynthia Ch. 7.1 Outline: This outline was very good. It included everything such as a short description of the chapter to the details of the figures in that section. There could be more details added to the description of the answers that you have.
Cynthia Trieu
1/20/2015 03:32:56 pm
(Self Evaluation) Leave a Reply. |